EVAN F. NAPPEN ATTORNEY AT LAW, PC
  • Home
  • Gun Law Books
  • Contact
  • About
  • Reviews
  • Expungements
  • Permit to Carry Handgun Granted
  • Book Update - Marijuana & Guns
  • Guns Taken and Not Returned? Now Go to Prison.
  • Roosevelt Twyne Case Dismissed!
  • Supreme Court to Hear Nappen Law Firm’s Legal Challenge to New Jersey Carry Permit Law
  • Declaratory Judgment Sought in NJ’s Carry Permit Scheme, Violates Full Faith & Credit
  • Book Update - Large Capacity Magazines
  • Knock! Knock! Show Us Your Glock
  • Cop Murphy Mag Fix Fail
  • Book Update - Bump Stocks & Trigger Cranks
  • Book Update - Stun Guns
  • Book Update - "Red Flag" Law
  • Book Update - Gun Forfeiture
  • Book Update - Sale of Firearms
  • Book Update - AP Ammuntion
  • Possible Defense for Possessing a Shockwave
  • Is the Mossberg “590® Shockwave” Legal in New Jersey?
  • 101 Reasons to Own an "Assault Weapon"
  • Nappen News Blog
  • Jersey City Man Granted Suppression of All Evidence Obtained Due To Officers’ Unlawful Entry of His Home
  • Home
  • Gun Law Books
  • Contact
  • About
  • Reviews
  • Expungements
  • Permit to Carry Handgun Granted
  • Book Update - Marijuana & Guns
  • Guns Taken and Not Returned? Now Go to Prison.
  • Roosevelt Twyne Case Dismissed!
  • Supreme Court to Hear Nappen Law Firm’s Legal Challenge to New Jersey Carry Permit Law
  • Declaratory Judgment Sought in NJ’s Carry Permit Scheme, Violates Full Faith & Credit
  • Book Update - Large Capacity Magazines
  • Knock! Knock! Show Us Your Glock
  • Cop Murphy Mag Fix Fail
  • Book Update - Bump Stocks & Trigger Cranks
  • Book Update - Stun Guns
  • Book Update - "Red Flag" Law
  • Book Update - Gun Forfeiture
  • Book Update - Sale of Firearms
  • Book Update - AP Ammuntion
  • Possible Defense for Possessing a Shockwave
  • Is the Mossberg “590® Shockwave” Legal in New Jersey?
  • 101 Reasons to Own an "Assault Weapon"
  • Nappen News Blog
  • Jersey City Man Granted Suppression of All Evidence Obtained Due To Officers’ Unlawful Entry of His Home
Search


​A Possible Defense When You Are Prosecuted for Possessing a Shockwave
(Despite the NJ State Police “Interpretation”)
 
By Evan F. Nappen, Esq.
 
An email was recently sent out to FFLs in New Jersey with a message from “THE NJSP FIREARMS INVESTIGATION UNIT.” It stated “…Mossberg Model 590 Shockwave, Black Aces Tactical DT and the Remington TAC-14. The New Jersey State Police Firearms Investigation Unit concurs with the Bureau of Alcohol Tobacco and Firearms (BATF) that these pistol grip only designed firearms are legal for sale in the State of New Jersey as a firearm.”
 
The email further states “As such the firearm will be sold utilizing normal retail sale procedures required under Federal and State law. The required State paperwork will include the Certificate Of Eligibility and not a Permit To Purchase A Handgun & Form Of Register.” This means obtaining one of these firearms is easier than transferring a handgun, and there is no registration.
 
This attorney respectfully disagrees with the State’s legal analysis. (See ---- http://www.evannappen.com/is-the-mossberg-ldquo590reg-shockwaverdquo-legal-in-new-jersey.html) This “interpretation”  by the NJSP might be ignored or challenged by an aggressive prosecutor, or the BATF or the NJSP might reverse themselves.  (BATF has reversed themselves too many times to count and the NJSP has done so as well. For example, remember temporary blocked large capacity magazines which went from legal to illegal.)
 
You might find yourself charged with unlawfully possession of something you could have sworn the NJSP said was lawful.  Here is a defense to such a State criminal charge that you may consider using.
 
N.J.S.: 2C:2-4. Ignorance or mistake
c. A belief that conduct does not legally constitute an offense is a defense to a prosecution for that offense based upon such conduct when:

(2) The actor acts in reasonable reliance upon an official statement of the law, afterward determined to be invalid or erroneous, contained in (a) a statute, (b) judicial decision, opinion, judgment, or rule, (c) an administrative order or grant of permission, or (d) an official interpretation of the public officer or body charged by law with responsibility for the interpretation, administration or enforcement of the law defining the offense; or

The defendant must prove a defense arising under subsection c. of this section by clear and convincing evidence. (Emphasis Added)

 
 
 
powered by BirdEye
  • Home
  • Gun Law Books
  • Contact
  • About
  • Reviews
  • Expungements
  • Permit to Carry Handgun Granted
  • Book Update - Marijuana & Guns
  • Guns Taken and Not Returned? Now Go to Prison.
  • Roosevelt Twyne Case Dismissed!
  • Supreme Court to Hear Nappen Law Firm’s Legal Challenge to New Jersey Carry Permit Law
  • Declaratory Judgment Sought in NJ’s Carry Permit Scheme, Violates Full Faith & Credit
  • Book Update - Large Capacity Magazines
  • Knock! Knock! Show Us Your Glock
  • Cop Murphy Mag Fix Fail
  • Book Update - Bump Stocks & Trigger Cranks
  • Book Update - Stun Guns
  • Book Update - "Red Flag" Law
  • Book Update - Gun Forfeiture
  • Book Update - Sale of Firearms
  • Book Update - AP Ammuntion
  • Possible Defense for Possessing a Shockwave
  • Is the Mossberg “590® Shockwave” Legal in New Jersey?
  • 101 Reasons to Own an "Assault Weapon"
  • Nappen News Blog
  • Jersey City Man Granted Suppression of All Evidence Obtained Due To Officers’ Unlawful Entry of His Home